Tuesday, March 07, 2006 Bush Asking for Line item Veto Yes, King George plans on expanding his kingly powers... despite the fact that the Supreme Crt has already determined in 1998 that the line item veto is unconsitutional b/c it was a violation of the Presentment Clause of the US Constitution (Art 1, Sect 7, Clause 2): "Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Reps and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the Pres of the US; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. "So, how exactly will the BushCo loving Supreme Crt explain why it was unconstitutional for Clinton but perfectly legit for this douchebag? |